SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 594

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
CHIRANJAN JADAVJI PADIA – Appellant
Versus
BHUPESH CHANDRA DUTT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIMAL CHATTERJI, DIPANKAR GHOSH, H.M.DUTT, NIRMAL ROY CHAUDHARY, P.K.ROY, P.N.GHOSH, S.K.ROY CHAUDHARY

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS suit has been instituted by the plaintiff who carries on business under the name and style of Chiranjan and Co. as the Foreign Exchange and Finance Broker. The plaintiff states that the plaintiff in his said firm name is a member of the Exchange and Bullion Brokers' Association. Calcutta, being the defendant No. 10 herein. There are several defendants in this suit namely, eleven of which defendants Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, are said to be members of the Association defendant No. 10 Exchange and Bullion Brokers' Association which has its office at No. 23a, Nelaji Subhas Road, Calcutta. Defendant No. 11 is the Foreign Exchange Dealers' Association of India hrivmg its office at No. 4, Netaji Suhhas Road, Calcutta. Originally the defendant No. 3 was sued in his capacity only as the Secretary of the defendant No. 10 Association. By an order made by me during the course of the hearing of this suit on the application of the plaintiff on the 20th of June, 1978 the said defendant No. 3 has been sued as Secretary of the said Association for self and on behalf of the members of the Exchange Brokers' Association. By the aforesaid order referred to here













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top