SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 551

G.N.RAY
MADURA COATS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARIJIT CHAUDHARY, B.P.BANERJI, D.K.SEN GUPTA, P.P.GINWALA, Ranen Mitra, T.K.Pal

G. N. RAY, J.

( 1 ) IN the instant writ petition the petitioner prays for issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari requiring respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to transmit and certify the records of the proceedings before them to this Court in the matter of determining as to whether nylon and rayon wrap sheets produced by the petitioner company are excisable items and their orders made in such proceedings including the orders dated 24th March, 1975 and 6th February, 1976 so that they are quashed or set aside. The petitioner company also prayed for a writ in the nature of prohibition prohibiting respondents from treating nylon or rayon warp sheets produced by the petitioner company as excisable items and also prohibiting the respondents from demanding, levying or collecting any excise duty in respect of such nylon or rayon warp sheets. The petitioner also prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus prohibiting the respondents from treating nylon or rayon warpsheets arranged or assembled by the petitioner company as excisable items and/or demanding, levying or collecting any excise duty in respect of such nylon or rayon warp sheets.

( 2 ) THE petitioner's case, in short, is that the pe











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top