SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Cal) 206

A.K.SENGUPTA, SHYAMAL KUMAR SEN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
RAI BAHADUR BISSESSWARLAL MOTILAL MALWASIE TRUST – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.BAJORIA, B.K.Bagchi, B.K.Chakravarti, J.P.KHAITAN

AJIT K. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, relates to the assessment year 1984-85.

( 2 ) THE assessee, admittedly, is a charitable trust registered with the Commissioner of Income-tax. For the assessment year 1984-85, the assessee filed its return on September 17, 1984, declaring a deficit of Rs. 1,61,452. The return so filed was not accompanied by audited accounts and audit report in Form No. 10b as required under Section 12a of the Act. The audit report dated November 12, 1984 was, however, filed by the assessee in the prescribed form on March 6, 1987, before the completion of the assessment. The Income-tax Officer, while completing the assessment, refused to allow the benefit of exemption under Section 11 of the Act to the assessee on the ground that audit report in Form No. 10b was not filed "along with the return". He computed the taxable income of the assessee at Rs. 11,24,430 as per assessment order dated March 31, 1987. Certain other objections raised by the Income-tax Officer are no more relevant as these were not upheld by the Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals ).

( 3 ) BEING aggrieved, the assessee challenged the abov
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top