SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Cal) 55

AMAL KANTI BHATTACHARJI, BHATTACHARYYA
BHADRESWAR PANDIT – Appellant
Versus
PUSPA RANI PANDIT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMITAVA PAIN, G.C.MUKHERJI, PRASANT BANERJI

AMAL KANTI BHATTACHARJI, BHATTACHARYYA

( 1 ) THIS is a defendant's appeal against a judgment and decree passed by the Sub-Judge, Second Court, Howrah, reversing a decree of dismissal passed by the Munsif, 4th Court, Howrah. The facts of the case is as follows :

( 2 ) THE plaintiff-respondent filed the suit in the Munsif's Court for evicting the defendant-appellant from the suit property claiming him to be a licensee therein. The plaintiff's case was that the suit property described in Schedule 'a' to the plaint originally belonged to one Sankar Kumar Patra who was a thicka tenant by erecting structures thereon. The said Sankar Patra sold his thicka tenancy right in respect of the entire 'a' Schedule property to one Satish Chandra Pandit, son of Manmatha Ch. Pand it, by a registered sale deed dated 22-2-67. While in possession of the property the said Satish Ch. Pandit inducted the defendant who is his own brother, there as a licensee. The plaintiff purchased the 'b' Schedule property out of the 'a' Schedule property from Satish Ch. Pandit by a registered deed dated 2-1-79. The defendant was in possession of one room in the 'b' Schedule property. According to the plaintiff the licen














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top