MONORANJAN MALLICK, M.N.RAY
KASSEM GHARAMI – Appellant
Versus
NIAMAT GHARAMI – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner-defendants are aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Assistant District Judge, 10th Court, Alipore in Title Suit No. 19/86 rejecting the petitioners' additional written statement and counter-claim on the ground that the counter-claim is barred by limitation that the petitioners have not paid the requisite court fee for the said counter-claim.
( 2 ) BEING aggrieved, the defendants-petitioners have moved this Court in revision contending inter alia that the additional written statement and counter-claim filed by the petitioners have given the date on which the course of action arose as 24. 12. 87 and when admittedly this additional written statement and the counter-claim were filed within three years thereof, the counter-claim could not be rejected by the learned Judge on the ground when the petitioners appealed in this Court on 24. 4. 86 and prayed for time to file written statement, they can be said to be well acquainted with the facts of the suit at least since that date and consequently, this additional written statement and counter-claim having been filed more than three years thereafter, are barred by limitation.
( 3 ) THE Ld. Ad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.