MONORANJAN MALLICK, M.N.RAY
RAM KRISHNA GRANTHAGAR – Appellant
Versus
AHI BHUSAN GHOSH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, 2nd Court, Howrah dt. 17. 3. 87 in T. A. No; 293/84 timing the judgment and decree passed by the 3rd Asstt. District Judge, Howrah in T. S. No. 63/81.
( 2 ) THE facts which may be necessary for disposing of the appeal may by briefly stated as follows :the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 has brought the above Title Suit for declaration of title, recovery of possession, permanent and mandatory injunction alleging that the plaintiff along with the respondents Nos. 6 and 7 are the exclusive owners of the suit property bearing Holding No. 9, Naba Kumar Nandy Lane and were in possession of the suit-property therein. He is an old man and used to live in Calcutta and for his service had to remain mostly at Beharampur while his nephews respondent Nos. 5 and 6 have been residing at Bangalore for their avocation. The plaintiff' sometime in 1980 on receipt of Summons in connection with the T. S. No. 154/80 pending in the local 3rd Munsif's Court, Howrah went to the suit property and found to his astonishment the existence of a club raising construction. As he raised protest, the S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.