SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Cal) 183

A.M.BHATTACHARJEE, N.K.BATABYAL
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Appellant
Versus
ANINDYA GOPAL MITRA – Respondent


A. M. BHATTACHARJEE, N. K. BATABYAL

( 1 ) THE Court : There will be an order in terms of prayer (a) of the petition. Leave is given to the petitioner to stamp and punch the petition within one week after the reopening of the Court.

( 2 ) AN application has been made for the stay of the operation of the order passed by the learned trial Judge in the writ proceeding which has wended its way before us in appeal. No copy of the judgment delivered by the learned trial Judge has been produced before us save the operative portion of the judgment. Ordinarily, and except for compelling reasons, we should not grant stay of operation of any judicial order without having an opportunity to go through the order. In view of the holidays for which the High Court is closed, it has not been possible for us to arrange for production of the records from the trial Court.

( 3 ) IN view of an order promulgated under section 144 of Criminal Procedure Code, the Bharatiya Janata Party applied to the Commissioner of Police for permission to hold the public meeting at the Brigade Parade Ground on 11th April, 1993. The Commissioner, however, has refused permission. No one, including the Commissioner has ever





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top