N.K.BATABYAL, A.M.BHATTACHARJEE
BEJOY KUMAR BOSE – Appellant
Versus
TRAFFIC MANAGER, CALCUTTA PORT TRUST – Respondent
( 1 ) BEING aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 30th July, 1992 passed by the learned Trial Judge in Civil Order No. 9333 (W) of 1991, the writ petitioners have preferred this appeal against the order of dismissal of the writ petition. In the original writ application, the appellants have prayed for issuance of a writ of Mandamus commanding the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 to grant and/or to renew the licence under Bye-Law No. 55a of the Bye-laws framed by the Calcutta Port Trust in favour of the appellant No. 1 who claims to be a registered Partner of the duly registered Partnership Firm, the appellant No. 2 and also to his Sircars, Clerks, Servants and Agents.
( 2 ) THERE was originally a Partnership business started under the name and style of Messrs. B. B. Bose and Sons to carry out business of clearing and forwarding agents for the Customs Authorities in Calcutta in the Jetty of Calcutta Port Trust between Shri Ganesh Chandra Bose (the respondent No. 7 in the appeal) with 75% share and Shri Dinendra Kumar Bose (the respondent No. 8 in the appeal) with 25% share. The Deed of Partnership was duly registered. The appellant, Shri Bijoy Kumar Bose is a s
D.L.F. Housing Construction (P) Ltd. v. Delhi Municipal Corporation etc.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.