SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Cal) 67

SAMARESH BANERJEE
SASANKA SEKHAR BASU – Appellant
Versus
MISS DIPIKA ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DILIP SETH, DIPTI BHATTACHARYA, RAJESWAR BHATTACHARJEE, SIBA PADA MUKHERJEE

S. BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) IN the instant revisional application an important question of law has arisen for consideration of the Court, namely whether a suit, in which reliefs other than reliefs contemplated under the various provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act have been prayed for, is to be filed before the Court of the learned District Judge under the provisions of the section of the Hindu Marriage Act or before the Court of a learned Munsif.

( 2 ) THE present petitioner as plaintiff filed a suit being Title Suit No. 93 of 1982 in the Court of the learned Munsif at Chandannagar against the opposite party inter alia on the pleadings that the opposite party is not legally married wife of the plaintiff and the opposite party did not acquire the status of wife of the plaintiff. The sum and substance of the case made out by the plaintiff in his plaint is that the plaintiff who is a Hindu while reading M. A. in the University of Calcutta became acquainted with the defendant some time in the year 1967-68 and such acquaintance developed into love and intimacy and finally they got married on 24th April, 1981 in the house of the defendant's father at Singur according to the Hindu rites and




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top