GITESH RANJAN BHATTACHARJEE
BROJENDRA NATH KOLEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) G. R. Bhattacharjee, J.-The short question that arises for decision in this revisional proceeding is whether at the stage of consideration of framing of charge by the Court the accused can demand production, inspection or supply of copies of documents which were seized by the police during the investigation of the case but copies of which were not supplied to the accused under section 207 Cr. P. C. on the ground that the prosecution would not rely on those documents at the trial of the case. In the present case charge-sheet has been submitted under sections 120b, 199 and 377a I. P. C. The allegation of the prosecution in short is that during a specified period there was withdrawal of a total amount of more than Rs. 4,67,900/from the banks by cheques out of which there was a defalcation of more than Rs. 55,000/- against false vouchers. The two petitioners who along with others are the accused in the case were the Directors of the Company and the allegation is that three Directors were authorised to sign cheques on behalf of the company severally and out of them one is now dead. During investigation police seized 112 cheques out of which copies o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.