SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Cal) 5

A.N.RAY
J. D. SINGH – Appellant
Versus
CALCUTTA PORT TRUST – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BARIN GHOSH, JAYANTI SAHANI, RUMA SIKDAR, S.P.MAJUMDER

A. N. RAY, J.


( 1 ) THESE are two applications, one made on behalf of the Trustees for the Port of Calcutta, inter alia - for recall of an order of attachment dated 18/07/1990 and the other on behalf of the award holder by way of execution of the decree passed upon the award by a garnishee attachment of rs. 3, 21,846. 94 out of the moneys held by the State Bank of India, and payment thereof.

( 2 ) THE award in the instant case was made by an Arbitrator nominated as per agreement between the parties by the President of the Indian Institute of Engineers. The only point in dispute in both the applications is whether the decree passed upon the award in the name of M/s. J. D. Singh and Co. can at all be put into execution in view of the fact that the same is only a business name of one J. D. Singh who is the proprietor and the sole owner of the said business.

( 3 ) MR. S. P. Majumdar, appearing for the Trustees for the Port of Calcutta, has said that under Order 30, Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code a person can be sued in the name of the business that he carries on. However there is no such enabling provision either in the Code of Civil Procedure or anywhere else in the general bod

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top