SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Cal) 351

S.K.SEN
ABUZAR M. HAKIMUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.CHOUDHARY, B.DEBNATH, DEBASIS KUNDU, R.K.CHAUDHARY, S.D.BANERJEE

S. K. SEN, J.


( 1 ) THE Court : The facts leading to this writ petition inter alia are that the writ petitioner firm participated in various tenders floated by Eastern Railway and quoted most reasonable prices for various types of stores and materials. Various tenders of the petitioners were accepted by the Railway and accordingly Railway placed diverse purchase orders, from time to time, on the writ petitioner firm at contracted rates.

( 2 ) PURSUANT to and in terms of the purchase orders placed by Eastern Railway the petitioner sold and delivered huge stores and materials, on diverse dates at the contracted price. The Respondent duly received, inspected, approved and accepted the said stores and materials without raising any disputes or differences whatsoever. The Bills raised and submitted by the petitioner were duly received and accepted by the respondents. It will be evident therefore that the petitioner had charged only the contracted rates and that the bills were duly being received by the respondents. There is not a single letter from the respondents raising my dispute or difference in connection with the said bills or any other bills of the petitioner firm.

( 3 ) THE ter
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top