S.K.SEN
ABUZAR M. HAKIMUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE Court : The facts leading to this writ petition inter alia are that the writ petitioner firm participated in various tenders floated by Eastern Railway and quoted most reasonable prices for various types of stores and materials. Various tenders of the petitioners were accepted by the Railway and accordingly Railway placed diverse purchase orders, from time to time, on the writ petitioner firm at contracted rates.
( 2 ) PURSUANT to and in terms of the purchase orders placed by Eastern Railway the petitioner sold and delivered huge stores and materials, on diverse dates at the contracted price. The Respondent duly received, inspected, approved and accepted the said stores and materials without raising any disputes or differences whatsoever. The Bills raised and submitted by the petitioner were duly received and accepted by the respondents. It will be evident therefore that the petitioner had charged only the contracted rates and that the bills were duly being received by the respondents. There is not a single letter from the respondents raising my dispute or difference in connection with the said bills or any other bills of the petitioner firm.
( 3 ) THE ter
REFERRED TO : Parameshwarilal Puruhottalall and Anr. v. Food Corporation of India and Ors.
Mahabir Auto Stores v. Indian Oil Corporation
Surendra Prasad Misra v. Oil and Natural Gas Commission
Kumari Srilekha Vidyarthi etc. v. State of U.P. and Ors.
Gujarat Steel Tubes v. Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.