SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Cal) 275

A.K.SENGUPTA, SHYAMAL KUMAR SEN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
HUKUMCHAND JUTE AND INDUSTRIES LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.MOITRA

AJIT K. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1978-79 and 1980-81, the following question of law has been referred to this court :"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and having regard to the fact that the brokerage expenses on export sales amounting to Rs. 2,61,827 in the assessment year 1978-79 and Rs. 3,65,768 in the assessment year 1980-81 were paid in rupees to parties in India, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the assessee was entitled to weighted deduction under Section 35b of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of the said payment of brokerage"

( 2 ) THE facts leading to this reference are that the assessee, a limited company, derives income from the manufacture and sale of jute and jute articles, chemicals and from export. The assessee claimed relief under Section 35b of the Act on the brokerage paid on export sales at Rs. 2,61,027 and Rs. 3,85,763 for the assessment years 1978-79 and 1980-81, respectively. The Income-tax Officer allowed relief under Section 35b on 50 per cent. of the said amounts and while allowing the relief he took into considera




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top