RUMA PAL
ASSOCIATED PIGMENTS LTD – Appellant
Versus
SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner company manufactures Lead Oxide Grey. The dispute in this case is whether Lead Oxide is classifiable under sub-heading No. 2804. 60 as per the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as Lead Oxide, Red Lead and Orange Lead or whether it is classifiable under sub-heading No. 3823. 00 as follows :-"prepared binders for foundry moulds or cores; chemical products and preparations of the chemical or allied industries (including those consisting of mixtures of natural products), not elsewhere specified or included; residual products of the chemical or allied industries, not elsewhere specified or included. ".
( 2 ) WITH effect from 28th February, 1986 Tariff Items under sub-heading No. 2804. 60 were introduced as separate items which read as follows :-"lead Oxide, Read Lead and Orange Lead -10%"
( 3 ) SUBSEQUENT to such introduction the petitioners paid Excise duty on the products manufactured by it under protest on the basis that the products manufactured by it were classifiable under sub-heading No. 2804. 60 and not under the residual item of Tariff.
( 4 ) ON 19th March, 1986 the Excise authorities drew samples from the petitioners' product Lead Oxide Grey.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.