SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Cal) 303

A.K.SENGUPTA, NURE ALAM CHOWDHURY
COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS – Appellant
Versus
LEXUS EXPORTS PRIVATE LTD. – Respondent


AJIT K. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent-writ petitioner, Lexus Export Private Ltd. (in short "lexus Export") entered into a contract with Messrs. Omega Enterprises, U. S. A. through Messrs. Hind International and Investment Ltd. , their sole procurement agent for China, South Korea, Taiwan and India for supply of 1,20,000 pieces of stainless steel rods, also known as stainless steel earth rod.

( 2 ) WHILE the supply under the aforesaid contract was pending, the respondent-writ petitioner entered into another contract with Messrs. Omega Enterprises, U. S. A. through Messrs. Hind International and Investment Ltd. for supply of 48,000 pieces of non-stainless steel rods, also known as non-stainless steel stay rods.

( 3 ) THERE is no dispute about the existence of both the contracts and about the obligation of the respondent-writ petitioner to supply stainless steel rods as well as non-stainless steel rods to Messrs. Omega Enterprises, U. S. A.

( 4 ) THE respondent-writ petitioner in terms of the second contract manufactured 36,000 pieces of non-stainless steel rods and loaded the same in six containers for effecting export. It is claimed that due to inadvertence in the documents



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top