SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Cal) 90

RUMA PAL
HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD – Appellant
Versus
APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.KHAITAN, Manisha Sil, MIHIR BHATTACHARJI, PRANAB PAL, R.N.BAJORIA

RUMA PAL, J.

( 1 ) THE short question involved in this writ application is whether the appropriate authority under Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), was justified in not disposing of the petitioners' statement under Form No. 37-I which had been submitted by the petitioners under Section 269uc of the Act.

( 2 ) THE facts are not in dispute. Petitioner No. 1 being desirous of transferring its industrial undertaking at Jagatdal, Barrackpore, North 24-Parganas, to Lipton India Limited as a going concern entered into an agreement with Lipton India Ltd. on November 8, 1991. That agreement records that petitioner No. 1 would transfer the undertaking to Lipton subject to obtaining approval from the authorities concerned including the Reserve Bank of India under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, and the Government of West Bengal under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The agreement envisages the transfer of the undertaking as a going concern together with land, building, machinery, equipment, movable properties, stock-in-trade as well as unionised and management employees of the undertaking with continuity of service























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top