SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Cal) 490

SHYAMAL KUMAR SEN, A.K.SENGUPTA
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
DUNLOP INDIA LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PAL

AJIT K. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference under Section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, relates to the assessment year 1980-81, the previous year ending December 31, 1979. The assessee is a limited company deriving income from business in the manufacture of tyres, tubes, etc.

( 2 ) THE assessee exported goods to several parties in Turkey between November, 1976, and September, 1977, amounting to Rs. 2,72, 19,587. The parties in Turkey were to pay for the goods in U. S. dollars and deposited an equivalent amount in lira in the Central Bank of Turkey. The Central Bank of Turkey, however, did not transfer the amount deposited by the purchasers in Turkey to India. In view of the extremely critical foreign exchange reserve position, the Government of Turkey imposed a ban on all remittances out of Turkey. As a result, the amount deposited in the Central Bank of Turkey remained there. The normal period of 90 days within which the sale proceeds should have been realised expired without any receipt by the assessee on account of the aforesaid ban. The assessee entered into correspondence with the Government of Turkey through the Indian Embassy there. In the meantime, the Turkish curren













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top