SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Cal) 411

BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE, N.K.BHATTACHARYYA
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
JANA SEVA KARJYALAYA LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.MISHRA, A.P.SARKAR, BIKASH RANJAN BHATTACHARJI, PRADIP GHOSH, S.BASU, S.N.MUKHERJEE, SANTI DAS

B. P. BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the order of the learned trial Judge passed in C. O. No. (not yet numbered) in Jana Sevak Karjyalaya Ltd. and another v. State of U. P. and another. By the said order the learned trial Judge after entertaining the writ application passed an ex parte interim order of injunction against the appellants with a direction upon the writ petitioners opposite parties to serve copy of the appellants. In this appeal the only contention of the appellants before us is that the learned trial Judge acted without jurisdiction and was wrong in passing the interim order of injunction inasmuch as this High Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the said writ application inasmuch as the cause of action wholly had been arisen outside the jurisdiction of this court. The appeal is confined only to this limited point. In order to decide this question, the relevant facts for this purpose are only considered.

( 2 ) 'janasevak Group of Newspapers' publishes their newspapers from Lucknow. The said newspaper group is obliged under the 'bachawat Award' to make payment of salaries and wages to the employees. The inability on the part of the employer to make pa









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top