SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Cal) 152

BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE
OM BIRANGANA RELIGIOUS SOCIETY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SARADINDU SAMANTA

B. P. BANERJEE,J.

( 1 ) IN this writ application, the petitioner, a religious organisation, claims that the respondents should not interfere with the right of user of microphones, loud-speakers, and for amplifying human voice and for amplifying other sounds while playing daily pujas and other religious activities and display of religious songs. The petitioner prayed for a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the District Magistrate and/or the Sub-Divisional Officer, Ghatal, to accord necessary permission in favour of the said society in terms of section 34a of the Police Act, 1963, (West Bengal Amendment ).

( 2 ) THE point raised in this writ application is of great public importance and significance. Section 34a of the Police Act, 1861, as amended by the West Bengal Act 38 of 1963, reads as follows:"34a. Power to prohibit, restrict, regulate or impose conditions on the use of microphones, etc. , (1) If, in the opinion of the Magistrate of the district or any Sub-Divisional Magistrate or Magistrate of the first class, it is necessary so to do for the purpose of preventing annoyance to, or injury to the health of, the public or any section thereof, or for the purpose of maint

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top