SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Cal) 443

DEBI PRASAD SARKAR
KARTIC CH. BAROYEE – Appellant
Versus
KASHI NATH MONDAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KRISHENENDU BANERJI

D. P. SARKAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil procedure directed against order No. 5 dated 1. 10. 1994 passed by the Munsif, 1st Court, Barasat in T. S. No. 424 of 1994. The learned advocate for the petitioner is present and made his submission in support of his application. The affidavit of service is filed, let it be kept with the record. According to the submission of the learned advocate for the petitioner, the petitioner is a tenant under the opposite party No. l and the petitioner as plaintiff filed a suit as mentioned above, claiming for declaration and injunction etc. restraining the defendant from disconnecting the electric line and water connection. The suit is pending even now but it is alleged that in the meantime on 21. 9. 1994 the petitioner was dispossessed from the suit properly forcibly by the opposite party No. 1 landlord. So, the petitioner filed a petition before the trial court to restore possession under section 151 CPC with the help of the police. The learned trial court by the impugned order was pleased to reject that prayer on the ground that the only remedy to get back possession in the suit premises lies under secti



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top