SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Cal) 68

BASUDEVA PANIGRAHI
AMENA BIBI – Appellant
Versus
SK. ABDUL HAQUE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.BAGCHI, A.K.SAHI, BHASKAR GHOSH, S.DAS GUPTA

BASUDEVA PANIGRAHI, J.


( 1 ) PLAINTIFFS in T. S. 68/1973 of the 5th Court of the Assistant District Judge, Alipur have called in question the legality, validity and the propriety of the order accepting the Advocate Commissioner's report in an application for pre-emption. The predecessors-in-interest of these petitioners filed a suit for partition and prayed for permanent injunction in T. S. 68/73 against the defendants/opposite parties. After the death of the original plaintiff, these petitioners were substituted as his legal representatives who were allowed to prosecute the suit. Sk. Abdul Haque, the defendant No. 1opposite party contested the said suit for partition by filing his written statement. The defendant No. 1 is said to have acquired an interest in the disputed property which is a family dwelling house under several purchase deeds. He is a stranger to the family. The partition suit was preliminarily decreed on contest against the defendant No. 1 and ex parte against others. In the said suit, it was held that the plaintiffs-petitioners were entitled to 209 / 864th share in the suit property. The final decree application is now pending in the Trial Court. Thus, the petitio








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top