SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Cal) 120

S.K.SEN
E. I. T. A. INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


S. K. SEN, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an application for confirmation of the Scheme of amalgamation of the petitioner Nos. 2 to 7 with the petitioner No. 1. On 28th September, 1994 an order was passed directing separate meeting of the members of the petitioner companies to be held for the purpose of considering and if thought fit approving with or without modification 9 the said scheme of Amalgamation. The said order was made in Form No. 35 under Rule 67 on an ex parte application of the applicants. The meetings were duly held under the Chairmanship of the Chairman appointed by this Court and the scheme was approved by the members of the petitioner companies at their respective meetings unanimously. Thereafter, the application was made under Section 391 (2) for confirmation of the said Scheme on the basis of the report filed by the Chairman.

( 2 ) THIS application for confirmation was opposed at the first instance by Narayan Prasad Lohia representing group of shareholders of the Transferee Company. After the matter was heard for two days Learned Counsel on behalf of the said Narayan Prasad Lohia submitted that he has instruction not to oppose the application. His further submission is recor



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top