SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Cal) 191

SUDHENDU NATH MALLICK, R.P.GUPTA
NANDITA ROY – Appellant
Versus
ASISH KUMAR ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHA HALDER, NANI GOPAL CHAUDHARY, NIRMAL KUMAR DEY

S. N. MALLICK, J.

( 1 ) THE instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant wife against the Judgement and decree dated 12. 9. 89 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 14th Court, Alipore thereby dismissing her matrimonial suit No. 39 of 1992 wherein she prayed for a decree of divorce against the husband respondent under the provisions of section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act on grounds of cruelty, both mental and physical and desertion. The husband respondent contested the above suit in the Trial Court denying all the material allegation contained in the petition for divorce and his specific case was that the appellant wife sometime after her marriage developed illicit and adulterous relationship with one Sibapada Banerjee the husband of the respondent's elder sister which became a public scandal injuring the social position of the respondent and the members of his family but the petitioner wife i. e. the present appellant did not mend her ways and on her own consent the respondent took him to her father's jpise at Baranagar on 26th August, 1979 for spending a few days there. Since then the petitioner has not come back to her matrimonial home. According to the appell







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top