SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Cal) 357

BASUDEVA PANIGRAHI
SUNIRMAL DAS – Appellant
Versus
KAMALA KANTA ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASIT BHATTACHARJEE, BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, D.P.ADHIKARI, J.H.MULLICK, M.DUTTA, S.Ghosh

B. PANIGRAHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application is directed against an Order/judgment passed by the Executing Court, Assistant District Judge, 8th court, Alipore in Execution Case No. 14/85 whereby and whereunder the court condoned the delay and issued notice against the Judgment-debtors.

( 2 ) THE case has suffered a chequered history. The opposite party, original Decree holder filed a suit in T. S. No. 1171/62 in the Original Side of this court for specific performance of contract against one Salil Kr. Das, the predecessor-in-interest of the opposite parties 2 to 4 and the predecessor-in-interest of the opposite parties 8 to 10, Malay Kr. Das and Chanchal Kr. Das; which was decreed on contest on 8th January, 1964. The decree-holder opposite party No. 1 filed another suit in T. S. No. 1171/62 for recovery of possession in the 8th court, Sub-ordinate Judge, Alipore and was decreed on 3rd October, 1969. After the decree the opposite party No. 1 levied execution case No. 6/76 against the Judgment-debtors in the 8th court of the Sub-ordinate Judge, Alipore and allegedly had taken delivery of possession with police help on 28th May,1977. Subsequently, the opposite party No. 1 said










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top