SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Cal) 370

V.N.KHARE, VINOD KUMAR GUPTA
COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX – Appellant
Versus
BIRESWAR SARKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.SHOME, M.L.Bhattacharya, NIYAZUDDIN KHAN, S.BOSE, SHYMMAL DUTTA

V. H. GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THE two appellants, namely commissioner of Gift Tax, and Gift Tax Officer, have come up in appeal against a judgment delivered on 7th April, 1993 in matter No. 539 of 1988 by a learned single Judge of this court regarding the validity of a notice issued under section 16 of the Gift Tax Act, 1958. It appears that respondent Bireswar Sarkar feeling aggrieved of the issuance of a notice under section 16 of the Gift Tax Act for the assessment year 1982-83 moved a writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in this court. Vide judgment dated 7th April, 1993 a learned single judge of this court by allowing the writ application of respondent quashed and set aside the impugned notice in the writ application. Even though the judgment under appeal was passed on 7th April, 1993, the present appeal was filed on 11. 09. 95. As per the noting and report submitted by the Superintendent, appeals section (Original Side) of this court, the appeal is barred by limitation by 856 days.

( 2 ) THE contention of the appellant is that the appeal is not barred by limitation because till date no order has been drawn-up as is required in terms of Rules 1 and 2 conta








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top