SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 339

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
ASHUTOSH JANA – Appellant
Versus
ANANTA KUMAR JANA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JYOTIRMOY BHATTACHARYA, SUBHRAKAMAL MUKHERJEE, SUPRIYA CHATTOPADHYAY

B. BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal is at the instance of defendant No. 2 in a suit for specific performance of contract and is directed against the judgment and decree dated March 10, 1988 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 3rd Court, Midnapore in other Appeal No. 500 of 1986 thereby reversing those dated April 30, 1986 passed by the learned Munsif, Additional Court at Contai in other Suit No. 35 of 1986.

( 2 ) THE parties to the instant proceeding are all brothers. The plaintiffs, two of the brothers, filed the aforesaid suit for specific performance of contract of sale of the property which was admittedly owned by defendant No. 1. According to the plaintiffs, the defendant No. 1 on November 6, 1976 entered into an Agreement for Sale of the suit property in their favour at the price of Rs. 2,500/- after receiving Rs. 2,000/- as earnest money. Subsequently the said defendant No. 1 sold away the suit property by a registered deed dated July 18, 1979 at a consi- deration of Rs. 4,490/- on the basis of an agreement for sale between defendant No. 1 and defendant No. 2 dated May 27, 1979.

( 3 ) THE aforesaid suit was not contested by defendant No. 1 but defend


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top