SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 374

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA, BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
MURLIDHAR RATANLAL EXPORTS LTD – Appellant
Versus
APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AWANI KUMAR RAY, L.K.CHATTERJI, RAJESH KUMAR GANGULY

V. K. GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal under the Letters Patent is directed against a judgment dated 10th March, 1998 by a learned Single Judge of this Court whereby the writ application filed by Respondent No. 4 in this appeal has been dismissed. Respondent No. 4 had filed writ petition No. 2886 of 1994 along with G. A. No. 2066 of 1995 wherein he had challenged the order dated 24-06-94 passed by Respondent No. 1, the Appropriate Authority consituted under section 269-UB of the Income Tax Act. In the writ application the appellant herein Murlidhar Ratanlal Exports Limited and Digvijay Cement Company Ltd. , Respondent No. 4 herein, had entered into an agreement of sale on 7th March, 1994 in their capacities as proposed Vendee and Vendor respectively in respect of the sale of a Mill known as "hasting Jute Mill" situated at G. T. Road, Rishra as a going concern, inclusive of assets and liabilities as per the terms and conditions contained in the said Agreement. The property included land measuring 105 bighas and 18 cottahs and the structures raised thereon along with all errections etc. , inclusive of fixitures and fittings and various plants and machineries. The total consideration by w

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top