SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 53

BIJITENDRA MOHAN MITRA
ANGSUMAN MUKHERJEE – Appellant
Versus
SHYAMALMOY PAL, CO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIKASH RANJAN BHATTACHARJI, DEBASIS KUNDU, NABANITA ROY

B. M. MITRA, J.

( 1 ) THE instant revisional application is taken up for hearing on contest being directed against an order dated December 4, 1997 passed by the Second Court of Additional District Judge, Siliguri in Misc. Appeal No. 36 of 1997 confirming Order No. 2 dated September 15, 1997 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Siliguri in O. C. Suit No. 200 of 1997. It is not out of context to mention at the outset that the connected suit is for reliefs by way of multiple declarations that the conduct of the defendant No. 3 in settling the tender bid work is illegal and void, a further declaration that the candidature of defendant No. 9 is void as he is a disqualified person as per the documents, for a decree of declaration that the plaintiffs are the only qualified successful bidders as per bid documents and for a perpetual injunction restraining the defendant Nos. 3 to 9 acting on the basis of decision of defendant Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 10 and for other consequential reliefs. The filing of the said suit is followed by filing of an application under Order 39 rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure with a prayer for ad-interim/temporary injunction restraining the defendant







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top