SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 54

RABIN BHATTACHARYYA, DEBI PRASAD SARKAR
BIMAL GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHIM ROY, BALAI CHANDRA ROY, KAZI SAFIULLA

R. BHATTACHARYYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS criminal appeal stems out the order of conviction and sentence passed against the accused persons for having committed offences under section 302/34 of the IPC and section 201/34 of the IPC convicting Bimal for imprisonment of life and both Siprarani and Kalidasi under section 201/34 of the IPC according to them the benefit of section 360 of the CRPC when this appeal for reversal of the order of conviction and sentence.

( 2 ) THE Hon'ble Justice Sagir Ahmed in Ajit Savant Majagvai v, State of Karnataka 1997 SCC (Cri) 992 spoke for the bench that 'battle of sexes has always been a battle of wits. Today it is denuded of its charms. It has degenerated into a war involving physical violence, torture, mental cruelty and murder of the female including partly the wife. "

( 3 ) WHEN we embark upon to scrutinise the authorship of the crime of the unfortunate story of torture and ill treatment, as alleged on Archana meated out to her which had resulted in her premature death at the hands of her relations and the appellant took a vow before the nuptial fire to be not only saviour but also guard her against all odds. In short, the vow or the promise so made by










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top