RABIN BHATTACHARYYA, ASISH BARAN MUKHERJEE
DURGAPRASAD GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
SAHADEB DEY – Respondent
( 1 ) THE above Misc. Case is directed against the order passed by his Lordships in Criminal Revision Nos. 89 and 90 of 1994, the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Dutta dated 16. 5. 94 "directing the officer-in-charge Jorashanko PS be accordingly, hereby appointed receiver in respect of the aforesaid 5 rooms in question in the disputed premises. He shall immediately take charge of the said 5 rooms; and shall hereafter make over possession of the same to the party concerned according to orders which may be passed by the City Civil Court in the aforesaid Title Suit No. 971 of 1992 in the light of the observations hereinabove made. Gauged in the background of the totality of the circumstances indicated above such a course also seems to me to be fit and proper for prevention of it (further) possible breach of peace and multiplicity of such like criminal proceedings". This order "shall not in any way preclude the petitioner Durgaprasad Gupta from taking steps against the contemner No. 1 Sahadeb Dey, for civil contempt and or under Order 33 Rule 2a of the Code of Civil Procedure before court for his alleged violation of the injunction order dated 15. 7. 92 the way he
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.