SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 28

S.K.SEN
SHYAMAL KUMAR DHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK MUKHERJI, Bandana Das, HIRAK MITRA, J.BAGCHI, JAYTOSH MAJUMDAR, P.R.MONDAL, SADANANDA GANGULY, SYED SHAFI AHMED, T.K.Jain

S. K. SEN, J.


( 1 ) IN the instant writ petition, the petitioners prayed for an appropriate direction to be issued upon the C. B. I. authorities to investigate and find out their missing daughter Susmita Dhar who was a student of Ist year M. A. of Jadavpur University. It has been submitted that the said girl along with her classmates, tutors and two other persons who are stated to be uncle and aunt being respondent Nos. 11 and 12 left for Chandipore on 13th May, 1995.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioners is that on 13th May, 1995 Shri Shyamal Dhar, petitioners No. 1 being the father of Susmita Dhar, took her to Howrah Station for the aforesaid journey to Chandipore. While other students who accompanied Susmita duly returned from Chandipore, the said Susmita did not return and actually she was missing from 16th May, 1995 from Santi Nivas Hotel at Chandipore. The other girls who accompanied Susmita lodged a complaint at Chandipore Police Station. A complaint was also lodged in Calcutta with the Special Superintendent, Missing Squad at Lord Sinha Road, Calcutta and subsequently on 29th May, 1995 two other complaints were lodged. On 26th June, 1995 another complaint was lodged with the a










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top