SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 272

BASUDEVA PANIGRAHI
RAM PRAWESH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bibhas Ch.Maity, Probhat Chattopadhyay

B. PANIGRAHI, J.

( 1 ) IN this case, the writ petitioners have prayed, inter alia, for a writ in the nature of mandamus against the respondents not to give effect to the impugned termination letter being Memo No. F. 44/kvc/93-94/admn. /pt-1, dated 30. 4. 93 issued by the Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chittaranjan, and further commanding the respondents to allow the petitioners to resume their duties in rendering service in their respective posts of Primary Recruit Teachers (P. R. T.) and Trained Graduate Teacher (T. G. T. ).

( 2 ) THE petitioners have claimed to have been selected and appointed in their respective posts of P. R. T. /t. G. T. from time to time on purely temporary, part-time and ad hoc basis as stop-gap arrangement. Though they have been rendering their service as a full-time permanent employee in the Kendriya Vidyalaya since their initial appointment, the authorities use to make artificial break now and then in their services. Petitioner No. 1 is an M. A. , B. Ed. having requisite qualification for the Trained Graduate Teacher in Hindi and therefore, he was selected and appointed on 20th June, 1989 through proper selection in the interview for the post of Trained










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top