SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 130

BIJITENDRA MOHAN MITRA, Y.R.MEENA
PORCELAIN CRAFTS AND COMPONENTS EXIM PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMR. OF CUS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mitra

( 1 ) THERE shall be an order in terms of prayer (a) of the petition.

( 2 ) BY this stay petition the appellants prayed that operation of the judgment and order dated 27th February, 1998, passed by the learned Trial Judge be stayed as also the proceedings pending before the Commissioner of Customs. The appellants further prayed that the goods bearing 74 cartons of Ceramic articles loaded in trailer no. WB 15-2653 and now lying in the dock, be returned to the appellants forthwith.

( 3 ) THE learned Counsel for the appellant Mr. Kapoor submits that once the value of the goods has been assessed and duty has been paid, as determined by the Customs Authorities, the Officer of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence has no power to detain the goods. He further submits that any proceedings, after filing of this writ, should be stayed as they are without jurisdiction. He further submits that once the duty is paid, no authority in the Department has power to reassess the value of the goods in question.

( 4 ) THE learned Additional Solicitor General Shri Mitra submits that the job of the Intelligence of the Revenue Department is to stop the evasion of duty. In any case if they find that d





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top