SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 143

S.NARAYAN
BUDHARU ROY AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAJESH SINGH, SAIDUR RAHAMAN

S. NARAYAN, J.

( 1 ) CONSEQUENT upon the death of the petitioners' son Buiya Roy in a motor accident caused by the maxi taxi No. WGV 2556, a claim of compensation was lodged before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, 2nd Court, Jalpaiguri, which was numbered as MAC No. 285 of 1996. Pending final disposal of the claim there was also a petition filed for payment of compensation on the principle of no fault liability that is, under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

( 2 ) WHILE considering the prayer as such the learned Tribunal by the impugned order dated 7. 11. 1997 asked the parties to adduce evidence with regard to their contentions in controversy. Suffice it to give extract of the impugned order which is as follows: though I have not meticulously gone through the decisions of the hon'ble High Court and the Supreme Court cited on behalf of the applicants since they are not placed before me this day, but I am of the view that this argument can be heard at length at the time of hearing argument of the claim application and that the applicants would not be prejudiced in any way if the O. P. 's claim is allowed since the applicants would get opportunity to cross-examine t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top