SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 145

BIJITENDRA MOHAN MITRA, Y.R.MEENA
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
DHAWAN INVESTMENT AND TRADING CO. LTD. – Respondent


Y. R. MEENA, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference application, the Tribunal was directed to refer the following questions for the opinion of this court :"1. Whether, the finding of the Tribunal relating to the allowance of deduction of business expenditure of Rs. 36,000 as and by way of payment of alleged rent is based on any relevant evidence or otherwise perverse ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in allowing the share loss of Rs. 49,210 in the purchase and sale of share ?"

( 2 ) THE assessee is an investment company. It derives income from interest and dividend. It is also engaged in purchase and sale of shares. Before the Assessing Officer, the assessee, inter alia, claimed deduction of Rs. 36,000 being rent in respect of the premises at Flat No. 84, at 6c, Middleton Street, Calcutta. The payment was made to one Nitin Dhawan, who is stated to be one of the directors of the assessee-company, up to February 16, 1981. Thereafter he became an employee of the assessee-company. The company has hired the premises on rent from June 1, 1981, in terms of a registered agreement to the effect that the assessee had given an advance of R









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top