SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 417

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
SABITA DEY – Appellant
Versus
NEERAJ ESTATE PVT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BISWAJIT BASU, D.N.MITRA, PRADIP CHATTERJI, Saptangshu Basu, SUDESHNA BAGCHI MAITY, Sudhis Das Gupta

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application under Section 115 of the code of Civil Procedure is at the instance of the legatee and the executrix of a Will and is directed against Order No. 21 dated August 19, 1998 passed by the Special Judge, and additional District Judge, Alipore in Revocation Suit No. 83 of 1997 arising out of porbate case No. 72 of 1994. By the aforesaid order the learned court below held that the revocation case under Section 263 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 at the instance of the opposite party was maintainable.

( 2 ) ONE Niharendra Nath Ghatak, executed the disputed Will thereby bequeathing all his movable and immovable property in favour of the petitioner No. 1. Petitioner No. 2 was made executrix of the said Will.

( 3 ) AT the instance of the petitioner No. 2, the probate of the said Will was granted by the District Judge. Thereafter the opposite party applied for revocation of the probate and in paragraphs 6 and 7 of the said application, opposite party made out its locus standi by making the following everments :-"by a registered indenture of conveyance dated 6th May, 1991 made between the said Niharendu Nath Ghatak therein referred to











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top