SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 256

PRADIPTA RAY, JYOTESH BANERJEE
SELVEL ADVERTISING PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
AMM MEDIA WORKS PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.KAR, B.S.SINHA ROY, CHANCHAL MITRA, DEBASHIS DAS, J.K.SANWANOALA

PRADIPTA RAY, J.

( 1 ) SELVEL Advertising Ltd. the present appellant (plaintiff in the Court below) entered into an agreement dated April 4, 1995 with Analysis marketing and Management, a propietory concern of present respondent No. 2 sri Somdeb Banerjee, (defendant No. 2 in the Court below) for execution of a proposed park named 'theme Park' at B. B. D. Bag Mini Bus Terminus area. Under the said agreement the said Theme Park was to be laid exclusively by the present appellant with the right to bring any sponsor of its choice and the appellant-company secured absolute and exclusive legal right to collect the cost of construction, monthly maintenance and monthly rental charges from such sponsor. As consideration the appellant company paid Rs. 2 lakhs to the respondent No. 2 on April 5, 1995 and agreed to pay Rs. 28,000/- every month to the said respondent No. 2. Although no period was expressly mentioned in the said agreement, it was stipulated in clause 19 of the agreement that:"19. The second party will comply and abide all the conditions contained in the lease deed (signed on 28th September, 1994) with Government of west Bengal and the first party. This also relates to the part




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top