SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 302

S.K.GUPTA
NIRMMAL KUMAR BOTHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KISHORE DUTTA, MILON MUKHARJI, SASHANKA KUMAR GHOSH

SADHAN KUMAR GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application has been filed under section 397/401 read with section 482 of the Cr. PC. The case of the petitioners is that petitioner No. 4 is a company, registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of tea. Petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are the Directors and the petitioner No. 3 is the Sale Supervisor of the said company. South Port Police Station Case No. 124 of 1993 dated 14. 05. 1993 under section 120b/272 of the Indian Penal Code was registered against the petitioners on the basis of G. D. Entry No. 1100 dated 14. 05. 93 by the Sub-Inspector Shri B. Saha. It was alleged in the said G. D. Entry that the complainant received an information to the effect that one Ganesh Prosad with his associates were running a business of adulteration of tea inside a warehouse situated at P-4/4, Watgunge. On the basis of the said information, the police party left the police station for raiding the said warehouse along with two witnesses. On entering into the said warehouse they found that one person was working inside the said warehouse with the help of some labourers. Said person on interrogation disclos








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top