SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 548

SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE
BASANTI SEAL – Appellant
Versus
PREMLAL SEAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.BACHAVAT, HARISH TANDON, NARAYAN DAS, R.P.MITRA, S.ROY CHAUDHARY

SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an application under section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure challenging the executability of the decree on the allegation that the decree passed in the suit is a nullity.

( 2 ) RADHESHYAM Seal was the owner of the suit property situated at 4, Krishna behari Sen Street, Kolkata -7 as also, of the properties at Chinsurah, District hooghly and at Jasidih in the State of Bihar now Jharkhand.

( 3 ) THE said Radheshyam Seal on September 1, 1937 executed a registered deed of trust in respect of his properties including the suit property. In the said deed of trust, the settlor appointed himself and his wife, Sabitri Seal, as the trustees to hold the properties for their use and benefits and after their demise for the benefits of their sons, namely Parbati Shankar Seal, Hiralal Seal and subal Charna Seal.

( 4 ) THE heirs and legal representatives of the said Subal Charan are the petitioners in this application.

( 5 ) IN the said deed of trust, the trustees reserved their rights to revoke the said trust and to appoint any of their sons as the beneficiaries.

( 6 ) ACCORDING to the terms of the said deed of trust, the properties covered by the s






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top