SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 577

P.N.SINHA
GAUTAM BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DIPANKAR CHAKRABORTY, MILON MUKHARJI, RABI SANKAR CHATTOPADHYAY, SANDIPAN GANGULY

P. N. SINHA, J.


( 1 ) THIS revisional application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for quashing the proceeding of section K2 Case No. 169 dated 12. 6. 01 i. e. Shakespeare Sarani P. S. Case No. 169 dated 12. 6. 01 (G. R. Case No. 1729 of 2001) under section 406/420 of IPC and the order dated 18. 12. 02 passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (hereinafter called the CMM), Calcutta thereby issuing warrant of arrest against the petitioner in connection with the aforesaid case.

( 2 ) LEARNED Advocate for the petitioner contended that the de facto complainant-cum-informant Monohor Agarwal previously filed a complaint against this petitioner in the Court of the learned CMM which was registered as complaint case C/2409 of 2001 under section 138 of the Negotiable instruments Act (hereinafter called the N I Act) alleging that the accused petitioner issued two cheques one bearing No. 004722 dated February 19, 2001 for Rs. 4,00,000. 00 and another cheque bearing No. 004723 dated February 26, 2001 for Rs. 4,86,464. 45 both drawn on UCO Bank, Kankurgachi Branch in favour of the de facto complainant company towards value of the goods delivered to petitioner and in discha













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top