SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 763

AMITAVA LALA
BIPUL KUMAR ROY – Appellant
Versus
M. N. ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.KAR, AMIT PRAKASH, M.M.DAS, SAJAHAN ALI KHAN, SANTI DAS

AMITAVA LALA, J.

( 1 ) THIS contempt application is arising out of non-compliance of the order of this Court passed on 19th June, 2002. Earlier by an order of the high Court the State Government issued an Office Order dated 22nd April, 1997, to facilitate the people attached to the Career Advancement Scheme under burdwan Zilla Parishad from 1st April, 1989 to 22nd August, 1996. A question arose why the same principle will not be applicable in respect of other districts. On 4th September, 1997 another Office Order was issued by the Principal secretary to follow the earlier Office Order dated 22nd April, 1997. An anomalous situation arose in reading paragraph XII of the Office Order. This Court clarified the same by holding that similar principle is to be adopted in respect of all the districts within the State with effect from 23rd August, 1996 in pursuance to the impugned order dated 4th September, 1997. The order would have been complied with at the earliest. But since the same has not been done, the petitioners made this contempt application wherein Rule was issued. The contemners having been present obtained exemption from personal appearance until and unless further order or o









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top