High Court Of Calcutta
Barin Ghosh
SK.BASED ALI - Appellant
Versus
W.B.S.E.B. - Respondent
W. P. 13691w Of 2000
Decided On : 02/16/2004
ELECTRICITY - SUPPLY - DISTRIBUTION LICENSEE - OBLIGATION TO SUPPLY - SECTION 43 OF THE ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 - REASONABLE EXPENSES - SECTION 46 OF THE ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 - TRANSFORMER - COST - ELECTRIC LINE - COST - SERVICE LINE - COST - CONSUMER - RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS - DISTRIBUTION LICENSEE - RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS - LEGISLATURE - INTENT - CHANGE IN LAW - EFFECT - DISTRIBUTION LICENSEE - POLICY - VALIDITY - AGREEMENT - COMPLETION - UNILATERAL ALTERATION - VALIDITY.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners in these writ petitions sought supply of electricity from the Board to energize their submersible pumps. The Board issued quotations to each petitioner, but the petitioners contended that the quotations were exorbitant and that the Board was not entitled to claim the cost of the transformer and the expenses connected with its installation.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the petitioners were not entitled to demand supply of electricity without payment of the cost of the transformer as well as the cost of the cable to be provided for energizing the transformer. The court also held that the Board was entitled to charge the cost of installation of a transformer and also the cost of laying the cable and other apparatus to energize such transformer.
Issues: 1. Whether the Board can claim from a prospective consumer the cost of transformer and incidental cost for installation of transformer? 2. Whether the petitioners are entitled to demand supply of electricity without payment of the cost of the transformer as well as the cost of the cable to be provided for energizing the transformer?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Board is entitled to claim from a prospective consumer the cost of transformer and incidental cost for installation of transformer, in terms of Section 46 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 2. The petitioners are not entitled to demand supply of electricity without payment of the cost of the transformer as well as the cost of the cable to be provided for energizing the transformer, as the Electricity Act, 2003 has brought about a change in the law and the Board's policy is valid.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petitions without any order as to costs, but directed the Board to keep alive the subject quotations for a period of 30 days from the date of the judgment and to effect supply of electricity to the petitioners within 21 days from the date of compliance of the requisites contained in the said quotations.
( 1 ) EACH of the petitioners, who have filed these writ petitions, seeks supply of electricity from the Board to energies his submersible pump. The petitioners of the writ petitions, being W. P. 13691 (W) of 2000, W. P. 13459 (W) of 2003, W. P. 14461 (W) of 2003, W. P. 15083 (W) of 2003, w. P. 15328 (W) of 2003, W. P. 15410 (W) of 2003, W. P. 15509 (W) of 2003, W. P. 15575 (W) of 2003, W. P. 15784 (W) of 2003, W. P. 16157 (W) of 2003, W. P. 16531 (W) of 2003, W. P. 16532 (W) of 2003, W. P. 17795 (W) of 2003, W. P. 18541 (W) of 2003, W. P. 18541 (W) of 2003, W. P. 20085 (W) of 2003 and W. P. 442 (W) of 2004, had applied for supply of electricity, the Board gave a quotation to each one of them, but the petitioners are contending that the quotations are exorbitant. They are contending that the Board is not entitled to claim the cost of the transformer and the expenses connected with installation of the transformer from the consumers. That appears to be the principal dispute in the said writ petitions. Against the applications made by the petitioners in W. P. 14509 (W) of 2003, W. P. 15097 (W) of 2003, W. P. 16033 to 16036 (W) of 2003, W. P. 16289 (W) of 2003, W. P. 16475 (W) of 2003, W. P. 16488 to 16490 (W) of 2003, W. P. 16521 (W) of 2003; W. P. 17557 to 17559 (W) of 2003, W. P. 18518 (W) of 2003, W. P. 18581 (W) of 2003, W. P. 2021 (W) of 2003, W. P. 138 (W) of 2004, W. P. 172 (W) of 2004, W. P. 228 (W) of 2004, W. P. 310 (W) of 2004, W. P. 536 (W) of 2004, W. P. 540 (W) of 2004, W. P. 548 (W) of 2004,w. P. 550 (W) of 2004, W. P. 551 (W) of 2004, W. P. 554 to 555 (W) of 2004, W. P. 557 to 558 (W) of 2004, W. P. 729 to 730 (W) of 2004 and W. P. 1200 (W) of 2004, the Board has issued quotations to the petitioners and the petitioners have discharged their obligations in terms of such quotations but the Board has not effected supply to those petitioners principally on the ground that according to the present policy of the Board each submersible pump shall be connected with one 10 KV transformer and accordingly, those quotations, which had not taken into account the cost of one such transformer and incidental costs for installation thereof, are required to the revised and fresh quotations are required to be issued and the petitioners are required to comply with the terms of such fresh quotations.
( 2 ) THE principal question that, therefore, falls for consideration is whether the Board can claim from a prospective consumer the cost of transformer and incidental cost for installation of transformer ?
( 3 ) DURING the course of hearing it transpired that it was brought to the notice of the Board that rampant pilferage of electricity is being committed by a few evil people for the purpose of energizing submersible pumps. In order to stop such pilferage the Board decided that steps should be taken to reach electricity to the prospective customers seeking supply of electricity to energies submersible pumps at the bare minimum expenditure. The Board ascertained that in order to run submersible pumps the customer is required to have supply of 3. 5 KV to 5. 5 KV electricity, inasmuch as the submersible pumps require in between 3. 5 H. P. and 5. 5 h. P. , except for grey areas where the requirement may go upto 7. 5 H. P. It is the case of the Board, as submitted to Court by its Engineer, who appeared in person, that on the basis of the specification of the Board, the board has been able to locate suppliers of 10 KV transformers and efforts are being made to locate suppliers of less than 10 KV transformers. It was thus submitted that the Board has taken a decision to install a 10 KV transformer for each submersible pump connection.
( 4 ) THE Electricity Act, 2003, hereinafter referred to as "the Act", came into effect from 10th June, 2003. By reason of Section 185 of the act the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 and the electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 stood repealed with effect from
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.