ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, TAPAN KUMAR DUTT
SHYAMA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
CESC LIMITED – Respondent
( 2 ) THE subject-matter of dispute is the grant of electricity connection to the respondent/writ petitioner. On a writ petition being filed (W. P. No. 5550 (W)/ 04) by the writ petitioner for grant of new electricity connection, a learned judge of this Court by an order datrd 10th June, 2004 disposed of the writ petition by directing the CESC authorities to give connection upon completion of necessary formalities. The present petitioner before us was not a party to the said proceeding, as such, an application has been filed for leave to file an appeal along with the stay petition and also a petition under section 5 of the Limitation act.
( 3 ) CONSIDERING the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the admitted position that the writ petitioner was initially inducted by the present petitioner as a licensee as per the version of the present petitioner, we do not think that we need to interfere with the order passed by the learned judge of the Writ Court. It is also not in dispute that a civil suit being Title suit No. 369/02 is pendi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.