SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 6

J.K.BISWAS
ANJALI MULLICK – Appellant
Versus
MRITYUNJOY DEY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUNAVA SEN GUPTA, D.BASAK, PUJADAS CHAUDHARY, SOUMEN SEN

J. K. BISWAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS application (G. A. No. 1881 of 2002) dated May 3rd, 2002 has been taken out by one Satyendra Nath Boral (hereinafter referred to as 'the applicant' ). It has been filed in the Partition and Administration Suit (No. 706 of 1979) pending in this Court. The applicant prays for his addition in the suit as a party defendant. He makes an alternative prayer for leave to intervene in the pending suit.

( 2 ) THE facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of this application are these. One Anjali Mullick as plaintiff filed the partition and administration suit in this Court in the year 1979. Seven persons were impleaded as defendants in it. In paragraph 19 (nineteen) of the plaint the plaintiff stated about the share of defendant 4 (Sm. Biva Boral) in the suit properties. On February 24th, 1980 defendant 4 filed her written statement. On August 31st 1991 defendant 4 executed and registered her Will. Applicant was appointed the sole executor. On December 5th, 1998 defendant 4 died. In 1999 the applicant filed an application (P. L. A. No. 97 of 1999) before this Court for grant of probate. On receipt of citation issued in such probate proceeding the plaintiff and














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top