SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 442

JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA
KAMALA KANT JHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHUDEV BHATTACHARYA, INDRAJIT KULKARNI, PRADIP TARAFDAR

JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA, J.


( 1 ) EARLIER a dispute was raised in the process of refixation of the scales of pay of the petitioner in course of implementation of the ROPA Rules, 1990. The petitioner claimed that in terms of the ROPA Rules, 1990, his pay fixation should have been made at Rs. 2,120/- in the scale of Rs. 1780-3780/-, but the respondent authorities wrongly fixed the pay of the petitioner at Rs. 1975/- in the scale of Rs. 1780-3750/ -.

( 2 ) ACCORDINGLY, the petitioner challenged the said erroneous pay fixation of the petitioner by filing a writ petition being C. O. No. 709 (W) of 1993 earlier in this Court.

( 3 ) DURING the pendency of the said writ petition, the District Inspector of schools (Secondary Education), South 24-Parganas by an Office Memo being no. 115 dated 12. 3. 1997 being Annexure 'p-3' to this writ petition, modified the earlier pay fixation of the petitioner and revised the pay of the petitioner at Rs. 2,120/- in the scale of pay of Rs. 1780-3780/- with effect from 1st April, 1986.

( 4 ) SINCE the pay fixation was revised by the concerned District Inspector of schools during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner did not ultimately procee
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top