( 1 ) IN this writ petition, the Order No. 26 dated 14th June, 2004 passed by the First Industrict (sic) Tribunal is under challenge. Such order is of an interlocutory application whereunder the petitioners herein made a prayer for the purpose of getting adjudication about the abuse of process till such time. A corrigendum is issued by the appropriate Government. The Corrigendum was necessitated for the purpose of rectification of earlier notification by incorporating the word 'workmen' instead and place of the word 'workman', although it appears that the Union is espousing the cause. The Tribunal held that on the basis of anticipation of modification of the order of reference by the government or for the purpose of rectification on the presumption that it will be amended, the Tribunal cannot wait indefinitely. Therefore, such application was dismissed by fixing a date for hearing on merit. According to me, generally the singular includes the plural. Therefore, pertinent question is whether by virtue of incorporation of the word 'workmen' in the place and instead of the word 'workman', the referring authority committed any gross mistake for which the proceeding can