SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 368

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
RANI SATI KEROSENE SUPPLY COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


( 1 ) BY this writ application, the petitioner No. 1, an agent of S. K. Oil under the West Bengal Kerosene Control Order, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as "the control Order") along with its two partners have challenged a suspension-cum-show cause notice dated December 10,2003 issued by the Director of Consumer goods, West Bengal and also a subsequent order dated January 9,2004 passed by the said Director cancelling agency-licence of the petitioner No. 1 in exercise of power conferred by paragraph 9 of the Control Order.

( 2 ) INITIALLY, the grievance of the petitioners was twofold.

( 3 ) FIRST, the Director of Consumer Goods, West Bengal, is not vested with the authority to cancel an agency-licence in the District of Purulia and it is for the district Magistrate of the District to take the appropriate decision. Secondly, even if, it is assumed for the sake of argument that the said Director has such power, the purported order dated January 9,2004 having been communicated to the petitioners by fax on January 30, 2004, i. e. beyond 30 days from the issue of order of suspension dated December 10, 2003, was liable to be set aside.

( 4 ) ON February 17, 2004, this matter was moved f

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top