PRATAP KUMAR RAY
CHANDI PRASAD MANDAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.
( 2 ) IN the instant case, it is the grievance of the petitioner, who was a candidate appeared in the interview for Group 'd' post in the secondary school, managed and controlled by the Chandernagore Municipality on the point that desire completion of process of selection the panel has not been approved by the District Inspector of Schools concerned. The petitioner prayed for writ of mandamus commanding the District Inspector of Schools concerned to approve the panel. This writ application has been opposed by the State respondents by filling an affidavit through the District Inspector of Schools concerned, contending, inter alia, that under the Recruitment Rules issued by the Director of School Education, West Bengal vide Memo No. 2066-G. A. dated 27th October, 1995 which has applicability with reference to all appointments of teaching and non-teaching staff of the school managed and controlled by the Chandernagore Municipality in view of their Rules namely, chandernagore Municipal Corporation (Education Committee) Rules, 1995, the Chandernagore Municipality has no jurisdiction and power to advertise
REFERRED TO : A. Umarani v. The Registrar Co-operative Society and Ors.
J. N. Ganatra v. Morvi Municipality, Morvi
Regional Manager v. Pawan Kumar Dube
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Gurnam Kaur
K. Ramadas Shenoy v. The Chief Officers, Town Municipal Council, Udipi and Ors.
Bhavnagar University v. Palitana Sugar Mill (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.