SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 205

AMITAVA LALA
MITHLESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SHYAM LALL PAIK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.HALDAR, B.K.DAS, R.S.SARUP

AMITAVA LALA, J.


( 1 ) THIS revisional application is made under section 397 read with section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

( 2 ) THE contention of the applicant herein is that at the time of passing the order the learned Judicial Magistrate ignored the provisions of section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure whereunder when a person of importance under such section wanted to be prosecuted connected with the discharge of the official duty, no Court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the previous sanction by the authority concerned. The learned Magistrate of the Court below held that publication of some defamatory matter allegedly springs out from his official course of duty. So it is amply clear that the complainant sought relief before this Court against the accused person for making false publication in a local weekly newspaper against him allegedly done by the accused person in discharge of his official duty, sanction under the aforesaid section is not required for initiating a legal action before the Court of Law.

( 3 ) THE question hereunder before this Court is whether there was any necessary of granting leave under section 197 of the Code of Cri













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top