SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 221

High Court Of Calcutta
Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
LAKSHMIRANI GARAI - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Respondent
W. P.  4542  Of  2004
Decided On : 03/24/2004

Advocates Appeared:
KESHAB BHATTACHARJI, KISHORE DUTTA, SUMITA SEN

The provisions of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1983, allowed for the recovery of Co-operative Bank dues under the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act.

Headnote:

Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act - Applicability to Co-operative Bank Dues - The court found that the provisions of the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act were applicable for the recovery of dues of the Co-operative Bank based on the relevant provisions of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1983.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the applicability of the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act for the recovery of Co-operative Bank dues, citing the provisions of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1983.

Finding of the Court:

The court found no irregularity or illegality in initiating the certificate proceeding for the recovery of Co-operative Bank dues under the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, based on the provisions of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1983. The writ petition was dismissed, and the interim order was vacated.

Issues: Applicability of Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act for Co-operative Bank dues

Ratio Decidendi: The relevant provisions of section 132 of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1983, allowed for the recovery of sums due to the Co-operative Society in the manner provided in the Second Schedule to the Act, which included the removal of dues payable by a member or sureties or successor as a public demand.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and there was no order as to costs.

PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, J.


( 1 ) THE petitioner has filed this writ petition questioning the applicability of the provisions of the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act for recovery of the dues of the Co-operative Bank. The petitioner has questioned the certificate proceedings on the aforesaid ground that the provisions of the Bengal Public demands Recovery Act are not at all applicable for recovery of the dues of the petitioner. In view of the provisions of section 132 of the West Bengal Co- operative Societies Act, 1983 any sum payable to the Co-operative Society in accordance with any decision shall be recoverable in the manner provided in the Second Schedule to the said Act and in the Second Schedule it has been specifically mentioned that the dues payable by a member or sureties or successor can be removed by the certificate officer as a public demand. The relevant provisions of section 132 of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies lakshmirani Garai vs. State of W. B. (P. K. Chattopadhyay, J.) 349 act is quoted hereunder and the relevant portion of the Second Schedule of the said Act is also quoted hereunder:"section 132. Recovery of sums due.-Any sum payable to the State government or to the Co-operative Society in accordance with any order, decision or award under this Act shall be recoverable in the manner provided in the Second Schedule to this Act or as the decree of a Court under the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908 ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ". "second SCHEDULE recovery of sums due serial nature of sums due method of recovery

( 2 ) IN view of the aforesaid provisions of section 132 of the West Bengal co-operative Societies Act, 1983, I am of the view that there is no irregularity and/ or illegality in the matter of initiating the certificate proceeding for recovery of the dues of the Co-operative Bank in terms of provisions of the Bengal Public demands Recovery Act.

( 3 ) FOR the aforementioned reasons, I do not find any illegality and/or irregularity in the acts and/or actions of the respondent authorities. Therefore, i do not find any merit in the present writ petition and the same therefore, stands dismissed. The interim order passed earlier in the matter also stands vacated.

( 4 ) THERE will be, however, no order as to costs.

( 5 ) LET urgent xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the petitioner as early as possible. Writ petition dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top